Pennsylvania teenager files lawsuit against Big Food for marketing addictive and harmful ultra-processed foods
12/17/2024 / By Ava Grace
- Bryce Martinez, an 18-year-old from Pennsylvania, has filed a lawsuit against 11 major food manufacturers, accusing them of producing and marketing ultra-processed foods (UPFs) that are as addictive and harmful as cigarettes.
- Martinez claims that UPFs are designed to be addictive through a combination of fats, salt, sugar and flavor enhancers, leading to severe health issues like fatty liver disease and Type 2 diabetes.
- The lawsuit highlights the aggressive marketing of UPFs to children, similar to tobacco industry tactics, with annual spending of nearly $2 billion on advertising targeting young consumers.
- The lawsuit, seen as a significant step in bringing attention to the issue of UPF consumption and its health effects, is part of a larger debate about food, health and corporate responsibility, potentially sparking meaningful changes in food labeling and marketing regulations.
In a groundbreaking lawsuit that has sparked intense debate, an 18-year-old Pennsylvania teenager, Bryce Martinez, has filed a lawsuit against 11 major food manufacturers, alleging that their ultra-processed foods (UPFs) are as addictive and harmful as cigarettes. Martinez claims that these foods caused him to develop fatty liver disease, Type 2 diabetes and other severe health problems.
The lawsuit, filed in the Court of Common Pleas in Philadelphia County, zeroes in on companies like Coca-Cola, Nestle USA, PepsiCo and General Mills. At the heart of the case is the allegation that these corporations have pursued a “predatory profiteering” strategy, deliberately marketing their UPFs to children without disclosing their dangers. (Related: FAST FOOD EPIDEMIC: Could and should Trump SHUTTER FAST FOOD CHAINS until diabetes, obesity and cancer rates decline?)
Critics note that it’s essential to understand what UPFs are and why they’re considered so dangerous. UPFs are industrially produced substances that imitate food. They’re made by fractioning natural foods, chemically modifying them and combining them with additives.
This process often involves techniques like molding, extrusion and pressurization. Common food brands like Bagel Bites, CheezIts, Hot Pockets and Sour Patch Kids are common examples of UPFs.
The lawsuit claims that UPFs are engineered to be as addictive as cigarettes. They argue that the food industry uses neuroscientists to create combinations of fats, salt, sugar and flavor enhancers that trigger food addictions. This is not just speculation; the scientific consensus is growing, linking UPF consumption to a range of health issues, including obesity, diabetes and heart disease.
Another crucial factor in the lawsuit is the aggressive marketing of UPFs to children. Industry leaders have adopted the tobacco industry’s playbook – they’ve used the same marketing tactics that made cigarettes addictive and appealing to young people.
According to the lawsuit, the food industry spends nearly $2 billion annually on advertising targeting children, often through TV ads, social media influencers and other platforms that kids frequent.
Children most vulnerable to Big Food’s marketing of UPFs
As the American Psychological Association has noted, children’s exposure to ads for unhealthy foods is a significant risk factor for obesity. However, pledges by Big Food to advertise only healthy products during children’s programming have not made a significant impact. This suggests that industry commitments to self-regulation have failed to protect children from the harmful effects of UPFs.
Factors such as socioeconomic status, access to healthy food options and cultural eating habits also play crucial roles in the consumption of UPFs. For instance, in low-income areas where UPFs are often more affordable and accessible, children are more likely to consume these products.
Moreover, education and awareness about the dangers of UPFs are crucial. While the food industry has a responsibility to inform consumers about the potential health risks, public health awareness campaigns can also play a significant role in helping parents make informed choices.
This lawsuit is part of a larger debate about the role of corporations in shaping public health outcomes. It echoes the tobacco litigation of the 1990s, where companies were held accountable for the harm caused by nicotine addiction. In this case, the claim is that food corporations have used similar tactics to hook young consumers on processed foods.
Watch this video lamenting the fact that ads for junk food are everywhere online, hooking kids into eating unhealthy food products.
This video is from the Daily Videos channel on Brighteon.com.
More related stories:
Ultra-processed foods: How bad are they for your health?
Top 10 TIPS for eating a decent food regimen during the holidays.
New study demonstrates the long-term damaging health effects of sugar exposure in utero and infancy.
Sources include:
Submit a correction >>
Tagged Under:
addiction, Big Food, Bryce Martinez, children's health, conspiracy, corruption, deception, diabetes, fast food, fatty liver disease, food science, food supply, frankenfood, grocery, Pennsylvania, products, progress, revolt, Type 2 Diabetes, UPF, uprising
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
RECENT NEWS & ARTICLES
